Emptiness and Dependent Arising
Interdependent appearance -- infallible.
Emptiness -- inexpressible reality.
As long as these two seem separate,
Buddha's insight is not understood.
- The Three Principles of the Path (11)
Empty because dependently arising.
Dependently arising because empty.
- A pith saying of Gelek Rimpoche

My dear friends,

Verse 11 of "The Three Principles of the Path" and Gelek Rimpoche's saying both point to the profound relationship between emptiness (śūnyatā) and dependent arising (pratītyasamutpāda). Understanding this relationship is crucial to grasping the essence of the Buddha's insight into the nature of reality.

Phenomena are empty of inherent existence, intrinsic nature, or self-essence. This means that nothing exists independently, by its own power, or in its own right. Instead, everything exists in relation to other things, in a web of interdependence.

Like love and compassion, emptiness and dependent arising are two sides of the same coin. They are not contradictory but complementary:

Understanding this unity helps dissolve the dualistic view that separates the conventional from the ultimate. It leads to a direct realization of the Buddha's insight, where one perceives all phenomena as dependently arisen and thus inherently empty, and their emptiness as the very ground of their dependent arising.

Both the verse and Gelek Rimpoche's saying guide us to see that the conventional truth of interdependent phenomena and the ultimate truth of emptiness are inseparable. This realization is crucial for understanding the profound wisdom of the Buddha and the true nature of reality.